Lazy = Not like their site
Not Lazy = Like their site

But that is a false dichotomy. It is possible to be Lazy and Like their site. or Not Lazy and Not like their site. But you don’t give me those options. I am, as it turns out, lazy. And , it just so happens, that I don’t particularly like their site. But that is a coincidence.

However, to answer your question by saying I am lazy is not fair. Because I am lazy in general. In this case I actually did some work in creating the site. Writing PHP code, crafting the CSS, and making things work the way I wanted. Including some tests in IE, firefox, opera and safari. So I am not really lazy. But that would have forced me to answer your question by saying I like the CBC look. I don’t. I think it could look much better.

The question you may be asking now is why I made it look this way. Simply to see if I could. That is all.

I still have a problem with the formation of your statement/question.
The word “So” at the beginning of your statement/question is implying a continuation/conclusion of a thought, I assume, I started. The initial thought was that I speak for myself despite all appearances to the contrary. Your conclusion is that either I am lazy or I like the CBC site’s look. Neither is a valid conclusion.

Then why are you trying so hard to look like the CBC.

It’s a strange headline, you’re right to poke fun at it, but you’ve gone and tagged it as ‘poor writing’ and … well … it’s not, it’s correct, you simply misread it.

The point: he can’t CONTROL it. Harper is all about control as I’m sure you, & we all, know. That is what is keeping him awake. He’s a megalomaniac, micro-manages everything, & he can’t control what’s happening in other countries & their govt.’s economic plans. So it freaks the poor boy out.